From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Nobis Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:55:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87a908qrmm.fsf@gmx.us> <877fvba32j.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRGi9-0001Ka-4S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:55:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRGi5-0004wq-0F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:55:53 -0500 Received: from basilikum.nobis-admin.de ([89.238.71.130]:41601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRGi4-0004wY-QS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 03:55:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by basilikum.nobis-admin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB2D7E365A for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:55:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from basilikum.nobis-admin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basilikum.nobis-admin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id na_86lv7Bx4N for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:55:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from karotte.fritz.box (f048047041.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.48.47.41]) by basilikum.nobis-admin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:55:38 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:56:11 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales writes: > the only difference is that you won't have to create the > infrastructure the NEXT time you as a developer or user want to add > syntax. But the hard part of e.g. the citation syntax is not the parser. The hart part are the semantics. The discussion in this thread is not about aesthectics of the syntax (at least that's not the main part), but about what the right abstraction is. The other hard part is implementing the machinery to make citations really great, i.e. jumping to the right entry in any of the different possible citation backends etc. -- Until the next mail..., Stefan.