From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Davison Subject: Re: Fontification of blocks Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:00:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <80aakevw4w.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <8739q1ihas.fsf@gmail.com> <80r5dlpfj6.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <87ei9jkl0l.fsf@gmail.com> <80sjw7qxem.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <80pqra2nqj.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <80sjvzsjq7.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39549 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pmso3-0008OI-Ib for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:00:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmsnz-0005rz-B9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:00:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:64283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pmsnz-0005rm-6j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:00:51 -0500 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so6400265wyj.0 for ; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:00:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80sjvzsjq7.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9b?= =?utf-8?Q?astien?= Vauban"'s message of "Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:55:12 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list S=C3=A9bastien Vauban writes: > Hi Dan, > > Dan Davison wrote: >> S=C3=A9bastien Vauban writes: >>> Dan Davison wrote: >>>> Just quickly, one thing I noticed is that the begin/end lines were vis= ible >>>> even inside folded trees. I.e., in a folded org file, containing many = src >>>> blocks, I could see the coloured backgrounds "poking out" of the folded >>>> sections, extending to the right of the screen. Do you see that? >>> >>> Yes, but that's already the current situation today, *when using faces = with >>> background*. My (future) patch does not change that, and I'm not sure >>> whether it should or not. In a way, I find this better: it makes it very >>> clear there is a code block folded at that point in the document. Yes, I >>> definitively prefer it that way -- if you don't mind. >> >> Hi Seb, hmm, maybe we're talking about different things. > > I think so as well. I was thinking you were talking about the delimiter l= ine > (begin_src and end_src) going up to the right end of the screen if the fu= lly > expanded view. > > Your picture shows it when folded. > >> I would say this is a bug. > > Indeed, that's definitely a bug. > >> A key part of Org's visual model is that folding hides content. Imo. I'm= not >> saying I know how to fix it, but that's a separate issue. Here are three >> screenshots: >> >> org-overview: >> org-content: >> show-all: > > Can you send me your file, for me to test if I have the same problem? I don't have that file any longer, but the problem occurs with all files. It is somewhat unpredictable -- I mess about with block show/hide, and global visibility cycling, and it happens eventually if not at first. E.g. this file --------------------------------- * heading #+begin_src emacs-lisp 1 #+end_src --------------------------------- > > FYI, I've seen that once when working on my patch[1], but never ever sinc= e the > last versions. Hence, just checking (plizz don't mind), are you really us= ing > the version committed in the trunk, yes, clean, HEAD is 88b793946. Note I'm on OS X (cocoa builds). Maybe someone else with OSX could try to reproduce this? It occurs with a distributed binary of aquamacs, and when loading nothing but Org, so it doesn't seem to be any local stuff of mine that's the problem. Dan > or some older version I may have sent on > this list? > >> (Btw, that's with the box face attribute set with your patch. Just >> playing with it to see if I like it.) > > Maybe make a try with underline and overline -- discovered not that long = ago. > I find that the nicest combination... As well for headings 1 and 2. I'll = send > my newest color theme very soon for you to see this, if you're interested. > Nope: correction, I'll put it directly on Worg. I'll ask for access, and = try > being autonomous for such things. > > Best regards, > Seb > > Footnotes: > [1] IIRC, Eric Fraga did see that as well, at some point in time.