From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: ebib configuration for org-bibtex Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:00:14 -1000 Message-ID: References: <8739hfn4zc.fsf@gmail.com> <871uwn9b6v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsoLg-0005BU-0J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:00:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsoLd-00030y-Qy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:00:23 -0400 Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:60168) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QsoLd-00030o-HM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:00:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871uwn9b6v.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:04:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org-mode Bastien writes: > Hi Thomas, > > tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >>> The :file property is treated in a special manner when Org-mode resolves >>> properties (notice it is an element of the `org-special-properties' >>> variable). I've just pushed up a change which temporarily removes :file >>> from this list while resolving bibtex entries. This change should fix >>> your reported problem -- please let me know if it doesn't. If any other >>> elements of `org-special-properties' seem likely to cause problems we >>> can temporarily remove them as well. >>> >>> Best -- Eric >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> I think this fix is causing some mischief. > > I reverted this commit -- let's wait Eric is back and can fix this with > a better solution. > > Thanks, Aloha Bastien, It appears I was wrong about this. I get the same behavior after the reversion. This is something I haven't seen before. I'll try to track down the problem. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com