From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) Subject: Re: Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:38:52 -1000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHO6n-0005Fs-E1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:39:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHO6l-0005RL-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:39:25 -0400 Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:51176) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHO6l-0005Qn-Nk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:39:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (John Hendy's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:28:51 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: emacs-orgmode John Hendy writes: > Thanks, Tom. Having an issue, though. From what I've read/heard... > =:width= is used for all backends now? This seems to be indicated by > this pretty recent post as well: > - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68306 > > #+begin_quote Aaron Ecay > > Eliminating subtleties is precisely the point of this change. All(-ish)* > backends now use :width. > > * As far as I.ve checked, HTML(+ derived backends) and LaTeX(+derived > backends). If there are any that don.t, they should probably be patched > to do so as well. > > #+end_quote > > Using #+attr_html :width 200px results in alt="" /> for me. > > Why isn't :width for html being parsed into width="200px" ? > > :options width="200px" works properly... but then again, I thought we > did away with :options var="value" syntax. > > Just trying to keep up! You're ahead of me, John. So far, I've used the latex and texinfo exporters, but haven't looked at the others, so don't have a sense of how uniform things might be across the backends. I'm in awe of the texinfo exporter, though. It does a terrific job, AFAICT. All the best, Tom -- T.S. Dye & Colleagues, Archaeologists 735 Bishop St, Suite 315, Honolulu, HI 96813 Tel: 808-529-0866, Fax: 808-529-0884 http://www.tsdye.com