From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:22:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87tz4fb2rb.fsf@kamaloka.dhatu> <74997EBF-D0EA-49F9-BC19-36535EE6ADC9@gmail.com> <87eiviqud3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87bpqmqrg3.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <31163.1240588625@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxOAb-0006kQ-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:22:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxOAW-0006eo-L7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:22:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50668 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxOAW-0006ee-DO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:22:28 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51196 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LxOAV-0005yD-O6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:22:28 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LxOAT-00040s-D1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:22:25 +0000 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:22:25 +0000 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:22:25 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2009-04-24 16:57 +0100, Nick Dokos wrote: >> Any one got a fix? >> > > Does replacing 'byte-compile-file' with 'batch-byte-compile' > make any difference? > > Nick Thanks, Nick. It turned out that was a typo when I manually copied this from my old setup. Cheers, -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: I use Emacs :.