From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:09:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfur6-0006zA-4w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:10:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfur1-0006tf-7s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:10:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54063 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mfur1-0006tN-2C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:10:23 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57711) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mfur0-0004bI-JZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:10:22 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mfuqy-0000XC-Fl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:10:20 +0200 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:10:20 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:10:20 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2009-08-25 11:59 +0100, Leo wrote: > I like n and p to move up and down like in many other modes for > example ibuffer, dired, Gnus etc. Changing this to be incompatible > with other modes alienates orgmode. So I'd vote to keep current > behaviour. > >> I would like to call a vote on this issue. Please weigh in. Should we >> make this change? yes or no? > > NO. Let me say a few more words. 1. I'd prefer keeping n and p as it is since it is quite standard elsewhere. 2. I don't mind changing and to normal cursor movement. 3. Uppercase N and P can be used to move the agenda to next and previous views. I like it better than M-n and M-p pair. Hope this helps. Leo -- Emacs uptime: 7 days, 21 hours, 46 minutes, 45 seconds