From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Berry Subject: Re: [babel][PATCHES] ob-R patches for review Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 02:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87ppjpm5n5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiE2o-00031J-P1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 22:26:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiE2i-0000Z6-HT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 22:26:46 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WiE2i-0000Z2-A2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 22:26:40 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WiE2g-0005u9-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 04:26:38 +0200 Received: from 172-7-166-26.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net ([172.7.166.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 04:26:38 +0200 Received: from ccberry by 172-7-166-26.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 04:26:38 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > > Rainer M Krug krugs.de> writes: > > > Hi > > > > Attached please find seven patches for review to implement the storing > > of org variables in their own environment and to make the org-issued R > > code look nicer in the R session. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rainer > > Hi Rainer, > > Thanks for these patches. I don't have the R experience to review or > maintain them, but I'm happy to apply them. > > I missed some previous discussion in this thread. Are these patches > ready to be applied as is? > IMO, the patches hard coded behaviors that would better be customizable and optional. Rainer and I had some back and forth about this -- see the thread. Best, Chuck