From: SabreWolfy <sabrewolfy@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: eval-line-and-step broken in org mode buffer
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:57:20 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20130607T135502-691@post.gmane.org> (raw)
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.ess.general/7239
I can confirm this with Org 7.8 and ESS 13.05 and R 3.0.1 under Ubuntu 12.04
LTS.
eval-line-and-step (F9) when in an Org file evaluates the line in R, and
then jumps the cursor elsewhere as described, instead of advancing it.
eval-line-and-step-invisibly advances the cursor to the next line, but does
not skip blank lines or comments.
Is this an ESS or Org issue?
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 11:57 SabreWolfy [this message]
2013-06-07 12:56 ` eval-line-and-step broken in org mode buffer Vitalie Spinu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20130607T135502-691@post.gmane.org \
--to=sabrewolfy@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).