From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Bach Subject: Re: org-list-allow-alphabetical LaTeX export Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkWUQ-00085P-Ev for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:28:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkWUP-0006gS-ML for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:28:14 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkWUP-0006gM-FW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 05:28:13 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UkWUN-0005Xv-0t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:28:11 +0200 Received: from arcss01.ait.ac.at ([62.218.164.126]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:28:11 +0200 Received: from phaebz by arcss01.ait.ac.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:28:11 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: > > Oh, I never saw it handled by the exporter, just a wrong assumption. Just > > out of curiosity, do you think this could be implemented 'easily'? > > I guess it could be - but I am not sure if it should. Conventions about the type of bullet to be used in a document > belong to the typesetting side, and I rather establish a global setting for a document than follow my > momentary decisions when I write the Org-mode version of it. On a similar vein, we do have lists starting > with - and * and +, but we still let LaTeX and HTML choose what to use as a bullet. To me this feels like the right behavior. Good point. The separation of typesetting and content is of course more reasonable than my lazyness.