From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Opendocument export causes error Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <9A971BBA-5975-417F-B85A-564E06CA77B5@beds.ac.uk> <87sj7nistw.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfQrM-0007lx-7x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 02:54:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfQrL-0005UB-G5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 02:54:36 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfQrL-0005U7-8a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 02:54:35 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TfQrS-0002I2-UO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:54:43 +0100 Received: from 217.10.60.85 ([217.10.60.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:54:42 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by 217.10.60.85 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:54:42 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K gmail.com> writes: > The problem is org-odt gets compiled on top of the wrong org-compat. > The org-compat in vanilla Emacs is wrong (for our purposes) while that > in your work-area is right. There is the slight problem that org-{,-e-}odt does not (require 'org-compat) and org-condition-case-unless-debug (which is only used by these two files) is itself not autoloaded, plus it is called from inside in a macro. I'm not entirely sure what happens for the OP since I can't reproduce the issue, but it would be worth a try to add that require(s) if only to clean thing up. Regards, Achim.