From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SW Subject: Re: org-export-select-tags Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <6745.1341869940@alphaville> <7268.1341871994@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoVqh-0008OD-Ap for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:31:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoVqW-0000CA-Db for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:31:10 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoVqW-0000Bt-6C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:31:00 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SoVqT-0007w0-3k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:30:57 +0200 Received: from 196-210-53-161.dynamic.isadsl.co.za ([196.210.53.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:30:57 +0200 Received: from sabrewolfy by 196-210-53-161.dynamic.isadsl.co.za with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:30:57 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > Apparently the (old) latex exporter still shows symptoms of that > disease. Note btw, that the buggy behavior is confined to the old > exporter: the new exporter DTRT with or without the empty line. I've seen some mention of this new exporter. Where can I find out more? Is it included in 7.8.11 yet, or still being tested? > As an object lesson for all of us (we might as well get *something* > positive out of this disaster ): > > o post an ECM to begin with - no ifs, ands or buts. > o post what you tested *exactly*. > o test what you (or somebody else) posted *exactly* as it was posted. Indeed. Good points, all. Thanks.