From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Peromsik Subject: Re: [Feature Request] org-mobile edit:add nodes Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 04:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87bommy5wj.fsf@altern.org> <87vckqdp1j.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5ok14q7.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SheQ4-0001Qu-T9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:15:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShePw-0002Fb-6W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:15:20 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShePv-0002EV-WA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:15:12 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShePo-0001P1-EF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:15:05 +0200 Received: from h-67-102-74-208.cmbrmaor.static.covad.net ([67.102.74.208]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:15:04 +0200 Received: from aaron by h-67-102-74-208.cmbrmaor.static.covad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:15:04 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Henning Weiss gmail.com> writes: > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Bastien gnu.org> wrote: > > > Hi Henning, > > Henning Weiss gmail.com> writes: > > I have refined the edit nodes patch. Aaron Peromsik has helped me > > with developing and testing it. He hasn't reported any problems with > > it and I have been using it for a couple of weeks now without > > experiencing any problems. > Thanks.  Can someone else test this patch?  I'm not using org-mobile.el. > > To make the testing of the new edit nodes more attractive, someone could compile the new editnodes branch from mobileorg-android. This branch adds support for refiling, deleting and archiving nodes. Further explanation can be found here. > > Henning > > For what it's worth, I have continued using the editnodes branch of mobileorg for Android along with Henning's editnodes patches for org-mode, and I have not had trouble with adding, deleting, or editing nodes. (Though as I have mentioned, it would be nice if there were a way to configure it to put new nodes at the top of the nodes at a given level instead of the bottom.) -- Aaron