From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Sexton Subject: Re: [BUG] some nasty bugs with PROPERTIES drawers Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87iq2qix1l.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <4C7D5032.9000600@ccbr.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57594 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqWA0-00078A-L0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqW9v-00045u-7a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06:20 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqW9v-00045c-1g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:06:15 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OqW9o-0003Ig-Tr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:06:09 +0200 Received: from ip-118-90-7-102.xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([118.90.7.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:06:08 +0200 Received: from psexton by ip-118-90-7-102.xdsl.xnet.co.nz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:06:08 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Erik Iverson ccbr.umn.edu> writes: > See the :exports argument, the default is code only. > > http://orgmode.org/org.html#exports That was my initial assumption, which is why I had BEGIN_SRC blocks in the file. But then I found that it crashed during export with these blocks, and stopped crashing once I changed them to BEGIN_EXAMPLE, which made me question my initial assumption and suspect that the BEGIN_SRC blocks were being evaluated/executed somehow. Paul