From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: PT Subject: Re: Making an org file more readable Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8858.1251092810@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <6389183B-B8F1-498B-9A96-8DECF364A777@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjR51-0005Qo-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:11:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MjR4x-0005LE-4J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:11:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35256 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MjR4w-0005Kw-OL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:11:18 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44639) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MjR4w-0003xf-6H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:11:18 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MjR4s-0004Zi-Uz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:11:15 +0200 Received: from dsl51B6131A.pool.t-online.hu ([81.182.19.26]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:11:14 +0200 Received: from spamfilteraccount by dsl51B6131A.pool.t-online.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 07:11:14 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes: > > I have just pushed a modification so that you can, after pulling > from git, set org-cycle-separator-lines to a negative number. > If you set it to -N, N empty lines will be required in order > to get a separation. But, if there are enough empty lines, > all will be shown. > > You might want to set this to -1., I like my old value of +2 best. I tried this new setting with 6.30 and it works well, thanks for this. The only strange case is when a header line doesn't have any content, only empty lines. So if there are 2 empty lines between headers * header1 * header2 Then the first empty line after header1 is folded regardless of the -1 setting. If I understand the feature correctly no folding should occur in this case either.