From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: PT Subject: Re: Org suggestion: option which allows moving subtrees freely Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <7E8FF335-50C9-4813-ADEF-B49B9333DFFE@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaoiF-0006Tt-DD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:36:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Maoi9-0006Oq-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:36:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Maoi9-0006Oc-9i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:36:09 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:61220) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Maoi8-0006ft-JK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:36:08 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Maoi7-0000ae-8U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:36:07 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Maoi3-0000c3-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:36:03 +0000 Received: from dsl51B67344.pool.t-online.hu ([81.182.115.68]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:36:03 +0000 Received: from spamfilteraccount by dsl51B67344.pool.t-online.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:36:03 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org PT gmail.com> writes: > > So it would spare at least an M-left for the user which doesn't seem much, but > small things add up in the long run. > Maybe the M-right part wouldn't be too hard either. If above the moved up header (which is now at the same level as its previous parent header after an automatic M-left) there is an other header on the same level then it could be put under it with an automatic M-right. It could spare 2 keypresses which would be a real improvement.