From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: User Subject: Testing presence of a property Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWblW-0005sX-Nq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:58:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MWblS-0005qs-8L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:58:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60925 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWblR-0005qm-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:58:10 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38849 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MWblR-00048I-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:58:09 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MWblO-0002tV-5K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:58:06 +0000 Received: from dsl51B67377.pool.t-online.hu ([81.182.115.119]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:58:06 +0000 Received: from spamfilteraccount by dsl51B67377.pool.t-online.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:58:06 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Is there a way to search for headlines which does *not* have set a particular property? Reading the manual I have the impression property search has the fixed syntax name=value, so there is no simple way to search for headers where a property is not yet set (that is, it has no value). The only way I found is testing for all possible values, but it's a bit clumsy (prop<>"value1"+prop<>"value2"+prop<>"value3"...). Is there a simpler way?