From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: User Subject: Re: Restore previous folded state of org buffer Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87hbx0zibp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vdlge6t2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eis3b7o8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MV9BQ-0005lW-Fh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:14:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MV9BL-0005jz-UO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:14:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51496 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MV9BL-0005js-LN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:14:51 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:34607 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MV9BL-0005EV-3R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:14:51 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MV9BG-0001Sx-FR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:14:46 +0000 Received: from dsl51B793A2.pool.t-online.hu ([81.183.147.162]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:14:46 +0000 Received: from spamfilteraccount by dsl51B793A2.pool.t-online.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:14:46 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien googlemail.com> writes: > > I was just about to suggest: "Why not using a VISIBILITY property > for that?" (that would spare us the additional file..) but you were > faster than me! :) > Ah, yes. Properties. Being a new user I haven't yet used them, so they didn't occur to me. Anyway, we have a draft working implementation of the folding restore feature, so it can be used to experiment with different storage variants.