From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGVyZSBRdWludGFuYSBTZWd1w60=?= Subject: Re: Tasks with lots of logbook entries are very slow Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:10:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20140325192714.212d2bcc@aga-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSiuQ-0007Z1-T7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:10:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSiuK-0004Fh-UX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:10:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSiuK-0004FX-Nz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:09:56 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSiuJ-0007nl-HL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:09:55 +0100 Received: from 185.13.76.78 ([185.13.76.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:09:55 +0100 Received: from pere by 185.13.76.78 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:09:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140325192714.212d2bcc@aga-netbook> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org El 25/03/14 19:27, Marcin Borkowski ha escrit: > Dnia 2014-03-25, o godz. 16:00:01 > Pere Quintana Seguí napisał(a): > >> I log most of my work with org-mode. Some of my tasks are repetitive, >> this is, I do them weekly or daily (i.e. empty mail inbox). After many >> years, the logs are very long. As a consequence, marking these tasks >> as done is *very* slow. >> >> Is there a workaround that does not involver deleting the logs? > > Archiving? > No, archiving would'nt work, as I need the task every day. Thanks for the tip. Pere