From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: Using CEDET modules from Emacs core
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:45:23 -0500
Message-ID: <jwvfujgtk53.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
References: <CAFyQvY16F7Vn0Wa=qV1g+HWWLV0cT7FaixLN8w7sJEAWJz9P3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2o9yp4qzn.fsf@newartisans.com> <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cedxw.fsf@newartisans.com> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org>
	<m27f5cxlk9.fsf@RFC1918.na.baesystems.com>
	<87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <m2a8a5uwq2.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<jwvlgtod5ef.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org>
	<m24m0cca2h.fsf_-_@newartisans.com>
	<jwvefzfaoum.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m2efz4noig.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<jwv37fkxfg1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<d1f190da-d6a0-ca7f-4248-30f6f20db7bd@yandex.ru>
	<5fbb38e9-9f95-823c-7042-afc9cfa1d863@siege-engine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <5fbb38e9-9f95-823c-7042-afc9cfa1d863@siege-engine.com> (Eric
	Ludlam's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:51:34 -0500")
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric Ludlam <eric@siege-engine.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org

>> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based
>> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away.
> While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss
> specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them,
> presumably after the most recent merge is completed.

Isn't it the case that CEDET could also make use of a Clang backend?


        Stefan