From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: Please test the new Makefile Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:33:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zkelyd7c.fsf@gnu.org> <4EF6FA7F.1050406@NexGo.DE> <6D5253C7-8D09-4443-9BE4-9B378299F655@ieee.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUME-0000aL-Ja for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:34:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUMD-0001lr-Gh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:34:10 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUMD-0001lj-Bc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:34:09 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfUMA-0001Fc-J3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:34:06 +0100 Received: from p578f1a05.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.143.26.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:34:06 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by p578f1a05.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:34:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6D5253C7-8D09-4443-9BE4-9B378299F655@ieee.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 26.12.2011 05:58, schrieb Takaaki ISHIKAWA: > I think many Org users are familiar to the previous installation > procedure by "make" not "make all", and some users wrote it in their > blog, Org manual [*1] too. Yes, the manual would need to be changed in any case. The semantics of some targets have changed as well, even when they are having the same name. > Don't you think this change has a wide impact for them? But it's just > a concern to me :) Again, if the consensus is that the default target should be "all", this is just a single line to add at the top of the main Makefile: .DEFAULT: all There are a few other changes I will have to implement, buit it will be in the new year. -- Achim. (on the road :-)