From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederik Subject: Re: Question to the list about csquotes Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:22:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <6492.1310169884@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <871uxxarjb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgYEg-0006Ga-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:22:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgYEd-0006ue-NK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:22:30 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgYEd-0006uS-3h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:22:27 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgYEY-0002IJ-Hx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:22:22 +0200 Received: from dslb-094-218-035-255.pools.arcor-ip.net ([94.218.35.255]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:22:22 +0200 Received: from freak.fred by dslb-094-218-035-255.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:22:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871uxxarjb.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 11.07.2011 15:14, schrieb Bastien: > Hi Nick, Thomas and Frederik, > > I've just sent a patch for this question: it sticks to the > solution suggested in this thread, with minor variations. > Thanks all for working out this simple solution! > > It defines a new `org-export-latex-quotes' variable -- please > see the docstring. > > The default behavior reproduces the current behavior, so no > one should be hurt in the process. > > Thanks for any feedback, > Do I have to apply the patch to the development version or is 7.6 just fine? Thanks & Regards -- Frederik