From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Using orgmode to take "inline notes" for research Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:36:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <80bp0iquxw.fsf@somewhere.org> <80lizkxy6j.fsf@somewhere.org> <8739ln49hc.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBbUq-0003HS-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:35:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBbUq-0007Hp-1w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:35:16 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBbUp-0007Hk-Pr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:35:16 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBbUm-0000Sk-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:35:12 +0200 Received: from h195.natout.aau.dk ([130.225.198.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:35:12 +0200 Received: from rasmus.pank by h195.natout.aau.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:35:12 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > It is cool but doesn't play well with margins, as you have seen. I've > given up on cool and use the following instead: I agree on the cool not being cool. However, I do wonder why you would want to use /ordinary/ footnotes rather than something easily removable such as fixmenotes, e.g. \fxnote[footnote]. The great thing is they are removed in the `final' print (i.e. when `draft' is not specified). >> - Some of my notes are multi paragraphs, which I prefer non-indented >> and separated by a line break rather than no line break and indented. >> But when exported, multiple paragraphs just "stack up" with no line >> break. Can I add this to your format? I use the following for empty lines. It is quite easy to adopt it document wide and probably even inside certain environments. \newcommand*{\tomlinje}[0]{\\[\baselineskip] \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}} I didn't get whether you are asking for footnotes specifically, but if this is the case you might be able to play around with \setlength{\footparindent}{} and friends? Cheers, Rasmus -- Sent from my Emacs