From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#10125: 24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order
 of byte compilation
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:01:53 -0500
Message-ID: <gvipm881r2.fsf__16496.0626782433$1322247814$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <81pqgh90sp.fsf@gmail.com> <E1RTYzR-00039k-Q6@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<81ipm9l9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <v062i9tk0d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<hffwhdqov3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87r50w47o3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<pr4nxsxdx7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41401)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RU13E-0008Qi-A4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:03:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1RU12W-00073M-0U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:03:08 -0500
Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.10125.B10125.132224781531930@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <pr4nxsxdx7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:19:48 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>
Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org, stelian.iancu@gmail.com, Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>

Glenn Morris wrote:

>> This uses the Emacs executable on the exec path, which might not be the
>> correct one.
>
> Yes; I wondered if (car command-line-args) was a reliable way to find
> the actual name of the running Emacs binary?

Turns out I was looking for invocation-directory and invocation-name.