From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dboyd2@mmm.com (J. David Boyd) Subject: Re: Do you like to have your TODOs at the same headline level? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86bndus5nd.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUdFc-0006Ow-CH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:08:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUdFY-0000Ms-8M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:08:36 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUdFY-0000MJ-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:08:32 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUdFW-00018f-7S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:08:30 +0200 Received: from 169.15.136.127 ([169.15.136.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:08:30 +0200 Received: from dboyd2 by 169.15.136.127 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:08:30 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastien Vauban writes: > William Denton writes: >> I'm trying to spend more time in a sparse tree view where I just see >> TODOs (C-c / t). I didn't like having the TODOs at different levels >> of indentation, though. I prefer seeing them all lined up, so I moved >> them all to be fourth-level headline. It's visually pleasing, and >> I don't care if a second-level headline has a fourth-level child >> without a third-level one. >> >> Do other people do this? > > No, and I don't think that's sane. It would be logical to expect > problems at export time (to LaTeX, among others) and in Org-lint. > > I try to put all the tasks at the 2nd level, the 1st level being > reserved for big sections such as "Administration", "Tasks", "Team", > etc. > > I'm very rigorous about expecting that all my "project management" > documents can be exported (without loosing subtrees or generating error) > to HTML (as the very first goal) and to LaTeX (as the second one). > > OTOH, I don't deny your wish to get things aligned; that's why I've > opted to 4-char todo states only! > > Best regards, > Seb 4-char todo states? How about a list? I can't picture how to abbreviate some things... Dave