From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer Stengele Subject: Set priority by S- or S- does not seem to work in an indirect buffer in the first todo headline Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:10:55 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic3Gg-0004Lz-Bx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic3Gf-0004LC-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic3Gf-0004L4-EK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:49 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ic3Ge-0008G3-EF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic3G8-0006JM-9q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:11:16 +0000 Received: from p57af0d6c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.175.13.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:11:16 +0000 Received: from rainer.stengele by p57af0d6c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:11:16 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org as the subjct already says ... S-up does not do in the indirect buffer what it does in the "direct" buffer. Instead of a priority I get "Beginning of buffer". Is this a bug? Rainer