From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Org-mode 4.78 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:31:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <41c818190706190807xdb55052n4214c7de8a505074@mail.gmail.com> <41c818190706190816g25ba440dqcb032b5594a48afd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1lu3-0002oW-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:22:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I1lu2-0002oH-4j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:22:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I1lu2-0002oE-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:22:30 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I1lu1-0002hv-KM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:22:29 -0400 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so1057536ika for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <41c818190706190816g25ba440dqcb032b5594a48afd@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: William Henney Cc: emacs-orgmode On Jun 19, 2007, at 17:16, William Henney wrote: > Just one more small request.... > > On 6/19/07, William Henney wrote: >> On 6/19/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> > - Promotion and demotion of items gets the indentation right. >> > >> > - Indenting lines with TAB is more intelligent. > > ... now that there is a syntactic difference between the bullet point > types, how about having a function that cycles between them (just + > and - by default). This could perhaps be bound to "C-c C--", or even > just "C-c -" since that is currently only useful inside tables - I > know you like to have busy keys :) How about the key sequences DEL - C-c C-c DEL + C-c C-c DEL 1. C-c C-c Not so bad, really. On the other hand, C-c - is clearly a possibility. We'll see. - Carsten > > Cheers > > Will > > > --=20 > > Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronom=EDa y Astrof=EDsica, > Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico, Campus Morelia > > -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477