From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Bug with Unicode text on properties Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:55:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtgu-0005md-V4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:56:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtgu-0005mQ-Cq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:56:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtgu-0005mN-6u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:56:56 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRtgt-000410-Ix for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:56:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Daniel Clemente Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 1, 2007, at 22:30, Daniel Clemente wrote: > Hi, > >> >> There are two issues here: >> >> 1. You are also using a dash-like character, \o4255. The Emacs >> [:alnum:] class >> does not match this, therefore this character will continue not=20= >> to be >> recognized. Use the underscore in property names, I am = supporting >> this. > > Mmm... I used the normal underscore, _ (95, #o137, #x5f, U+005F). I > don't find \o4255. > >> >> 2. Think twice before using non-ascii characters in property names. >> This will make you file non-portable. If you send it to someone >> living in a different locale, he/she might find the file broken. >> > ASCII doesn't work with my language (ex: Spanish); therefore I=20 > don't use it. > But what I used is Unicode, and I wouldn't call it =84non-portable" > nowadays (it works everywhere on the Internet and operating systems). > Even if =84there can be programs which don't support Unicode", that's > not a reason to not using Unicode; what we must do --in my opinion-- > is fix the programs. I agree, but it is a fact that text you sent me did not look at all like spanish, but pretty much garbled. Anyway, 5.08 will allow [[:alnum:]-_] for properties. - Carsten