From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: FR: Using properties to customize global settings on a per-entry basis Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <93a9124009e1ee0ce55829e44bf3a878@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdL6W-0000uZ-MU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:26:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdL6U-0000tN-VR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:26:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdL6U-0000tD-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:26:38 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdL6U-0005x9-Jk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:26:38 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdL6P-0003bh-Bw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:26:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Oct 3, 2007, at 19:57, John Wiegley wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> OK, how about a general mechanism like this: If there is a property >> :org-log-done:, it will be used instead of the current value of >> org-log-done during TODO state changeing, like >> >> * repetitive entry >> :PROPERTIES: >> :org-log-done: nil >> :END: > > Sounds like a great way to do it! The alternative would be a LOGGING property where you could set the same keywords as in the STARTUP line. What is better? - Carsten