From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: M-m (back-to-indentation) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:42:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hsw58-0008H6-Hv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 03:25:26 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hsw56-0008FL-Uz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 03:25:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hsw56-0008Ew-NJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 03:25:24 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hsw55-0006IA-CP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 03:25:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Scott Jaderholm Cc: emacs-orgmode On May 26, 2007, at 23:25, Scott Jaderholm wrote: > I just discovered this keystroke and naturally the second thing I did > after trying it in an emacs lisp buffer was to try it in org. It > didn't seem all that useful, except with CLOSED lines and - lists, and > so I'm wondering if a slightly modified behavior might be better. > > Consider a headline: > ** TODO Something > > Maybe M-m should go right before "TODO"? I don't think this would be close enough to the standard meaning of this command, so Emacs rules are strongly against this and I tend to agree. - Carsten