From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
To: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: counter-intuitive key bindings
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:57:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f244fec1a87b061814104badfb52a417@science.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070728125242.GC22472@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
On Jul 28, 2007, at 14:52, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:17:06PM +0100, Leo wrote:
>> (info "(org)Multiple sets in one file")
>> | `C-S-<right>'
>> | `C-S-<left>'
>> | These keys jump from one TODO subset to the next. In the above
>> | example, `C-S-<right>' would jump from `TODO' or `DONE' to
>> | `REPORT', and any of the words in the second row to `CANCELED'.
>>
>> These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to
>> another, which intuitively are a vertical motion. See this configure:
>>
>> | (setq org-todo-keywords
>> | '((sequence "TODO" "|" "DONE")
>> | (sequence "REPORT" "BUG" "KNOWNCAUSE" "|" "FIXED")
>> | (sequence "|" "CANCELED")))
>>
>> I would propose to change these key bindings to:
>>
>> C-S-<up/down>
>
> Agreed, this is more logical, although the modified cursor key
> bindings are always going to be contended. Personally I have a
> "global" standard set of key bindings for outline navigation and
> editing which applies across several modes: folding-mode, org-mode,
> outline-minor-mode (and allout), orgstruct-mode. Having to remember
> different bindings for how to hide/reveal/zoom to a subtree in each
> mode is a nightmare. I would love to see some standardization here
> with more mode authors talking to each other.
>
> On a related topic, if I have S-{left,right} on my org-disputed-keys
> list, this breaks using them for changing a timestamp by one-day
> increments, even though I don't consider that a clashing binding. I
> guess I am arguing that this is a minor bug with `org-key' being too
> indiscriminate in when it filters bindings.
Why do you then have these keys on your list? What are you
using them for? How is org-mode supposed to know in what
situations you don't what org-mode to use them?
- Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-28 11:17 counter-intuitive key bindings Leo
2007-07-28 11:43 ` Bastien
2007-07-28 18:35 ` Leo
2007-08-09 5:05 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-08-15 16:57 ` Leo
2007-08-16 6:13 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-28 12:52 ` Adam Spiers
2007-08-10 6:57 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2007-09-01 10:22 ` Adam Spiers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f244fec1a87b061814104badfb52a417@science.uva.nl \
--to=dominik@science.uva.nl \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=orgmode@adamspiers.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).