From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Avdi Grimm" Subject: Re: How you can help Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <967CE7ED-05E9-4031-9F3B-CFB826511554@alexanderonline.org> <87ljwfbdga.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <874p33jovu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt2tR-00020n-DR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt2tQ-00020W-9H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:37 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36426 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kt2tQ-00020T-4X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:36 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.243]:56004) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kt2tQ-0006kj-Am for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:36 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so481592rvb.6 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:18:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874p33jovu.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Org-Mode I've been considering buckling down and doing some more ELisp coding, which would mean org-mode coding because I've become ridiculously dependent on org-mode. If I do, I would only do it in a test-first way, because that's the only way I'll write code anymore; so it would definitely be good to know that unit tests will be be accepted into the codebase. Personally, if I did this I think I would like to use Emacs Lisp Expectations: http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/EmacsLispExpectations I'm a big fan of Jay Field's work, I like the way the original Expectations for Ruby is structured, and I like the looks of the EL Expectations API. I'm open to other libraries though - so long as SOME unit-testing standard it accepted. -- Avdi Home: http://avdi.org Developer Blog: http://avdi.org/devblog/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/avdi Journal: http://avdi.livejournal.com