On 3/7/23 20:52, Bruno Barbier wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > > >> If org merely wraps in a `let`, it should not notice any of the multiple values >> business, because that is something done internally in `let-values`. >> > The "let", to define the org variables, ends up putting the "import" > inside the scheme expression, like this: > > ;; -*- geiser-scheme-implementation: guile -*- > (let ((x '1) > (y '2)) > (import (except (rnrs base) error vector-map) > (only (guile) > lambda* > λ) > ;; let-values > (srfi srfi-11)) > > (let-values ([(a b) (values x y)]) > (simple-format #t "~a ~a\n" a b)) > ) > > > which raises an error when evaluated the first time (the second time, > the "import" has already imported the new "let-values" feature > (srfi-11), so, the evaluation works). You can test this manually in a > guile session. > > I guess you'll have to use sessions, and do the "import" in a separate > block first. > > Bruno Actually, now that I think about it, the whole problem is gone, when replacing the wrapping let with 2 separate (define ...), which I originally thought org would do: ~~~~START~~~~ $ guile GNU Guile 3.0.9 Copyright (C) 1995-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (define x 1) scheme@(guile-user)> (define y 2) scheme@(guile-user)> (import (except (rnrs base) error vector-map) ... (only (guile) ... lambda* ... λ) ... ;; let-values ... (srfi srfi-11)) scheme@(guile-user)> (let-values ([(a b) (values x y)]) ... (simple-format #t "~a ~a\n" a b)) 1 2 ~~~~~END~~~~~ Or in one input to the REPL: ~~~~START~~~~ $ guile GNU Guile 3.0.9 Copyright (C) 1995-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guile-user)> (define x 1) scheme@(guile-user)> (define y 2) scheme@(guile-user)> (import (except (rnrs base) error vector-map) ... (only (guile) ... lambda* ... λ) ... ;; let-values ... (srfi srfi-11)) scheme@(guile-user)> (let-values ([(a b) (values x y)]) ... (simple-format #t "~a ~a\n" a b)) 1 2 ~~~~~END~~~~~ Is there a reason it has to be wrapped in a let, instead of simply define-ing the variables? Regards, Zelphir -- repositories:https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl