From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: Effort_all Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:35:10 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoFJ8-00073R-Hd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:05:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LoFJ4-00071p-2M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:05:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41302 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LoFJ3-00071m-Tl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:05:29 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.187]:59351) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LoFJ3-0007FW-2S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:05:29 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y8so1322153tia.10 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:05:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rustom Mody Cc: emacs-orgmode On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: > I am quoting from Charles Cave's "How I use emacs and org to > implement GTD" > > He showshas two configuration lines: > > #+PROPERTY: Effort_ALL 0:10 0:20 0:30 1:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 > #+PROPERTY: Effort_ALL 0 0:10 0:20 0:30 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 8:00 > with one#+COLUMNS: line in between > > Can someone throw some light on this? I believe this is just a remnant of some experimentation done while writing the article. The first line will be in effect if you have both defined. In fact, if you were to refresh the setup in the file, only the first one takes effect (the second one is ignored, unless removed.) And #+COLUMNS being in between the two has no significance. -- Manish