From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: Docs submitted (Was Re: Advice sought on managing decision alternatives.) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:20:41 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20090101170227.C707734803@mail2.panix.com> <1044.66.30.185.29.1234039592.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <6444D654-9B7B-415D-A6DB-F3BADCB1EE2A@uva.nl> <1451.24.63.21.131.1234124707.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <8BD25355-1218-4DB5-9C85-77EA011540D0@uva.nl> <1555.24.62.30.15.1234235653.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <2162.24.62.30.15.1234306137.squirrel@mail.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXb1k-0006q5-OB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXb1i-0006pq-SJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51660 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXb1i-0006pn-Hw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:46 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.184]:2734) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXb1h-0007S6-PW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:50:46 -0500 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so376514tid.10 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:50:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2162.24.62.30.15.1234306137.squirrel@mail.panix.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: >> With three choices for choosenness, it works as I expected (only one >> item in CHOSEN state at a time) but for more choices like: >> >> #+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0) >> LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+) >> >> it allows multiple items to be in CHOSEN state. How do we interpret >> that? > > I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before? Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below: First the test file. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0) LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+) * Which editor to use? *** LEANING_TOWARDS Emacs *** LEANING_TOWARDS Vim *** LEANING_TOWARDS Textmate *** REJECTED Gedit *** REJECTED Textpad --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- 0. I have latest org-choose loaded, org-mode restarted, and local setup refreshed. 1. S-right on the second item to switch it to CHOSEN state. It works. 2. Now S-right on the first item to switch it to CHOSEN state. Also works. Both entries stay at CHOSEN state whereas I expected the second entry to switch to a NON-CHOSEN state (possibly switching just one state backwards not all the way back to REJECTED, but then I do not yet understand it fully.) Is this the right behaviour? If yes, please help me understand this a little. Or could I be doing or have something wrong in my setup? Regards, -- Manish