From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: POLL: the 40 variables project Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:22:34 +0530 Message-ID: References: <3CA13AF2-AFF7-49D1-97B6-7AF5AF6C1301@uva.nl> <7ACEEBD0-B96A-4181-A729-2E226E8935D4@uva.nl> <45E50DB7-E2E5-4DBB-AD44-3CC650ADD1C1@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSp78-0006EL-HN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:52:38 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSp77-0006E9-4u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:52:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45561 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSp77-0006E6-2j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:52:37 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.188]:33694) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSp76-0007sx-Jx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:52:36 -0500 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so90830tia.10 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:52:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45E50DB7-E2E5-4DBB-AD44-3CC650ADD1C1@uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs org-mode mailing list On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > [snip] > > You need to change $2 and $1 to the relevant columns in your table, > maybe this is the problem? Yes, I had changed only one of them. Thanks. > I made this formula on one of your extracted tables where the variable > was in column one and I have created a new column 2 for the default > values. > > also, the formula seems to return (nil) or (t) instead of nil or t, > so it seems to add an additional pair of parenthesis. When I applied the formula on the main table (in raw data file), it did return nil, (nil), t, (t) and complex for values. Perhaps getting a nil or (nil) or a t or (t) depends on the kind of values a variable can take? Anyhow, I will try and add additional results to the data if we get more responses (so far 2.) -- Manish