emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Manish <mailtomanish.sharma@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: Fix Subtle Heading Creation Bugs
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:29:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7cdbe30810181059n5b5251eaw31f91f8444b5119a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ljwm6i4j.fsf@pmade.com>

  On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
  > Carsten Dominik writes:
  >> I am not so sure about forcing headline creation even when in a plain
  >> list item.  I can see why you would want it like this.  However, the
  >> reason for the current behavior is that then you can use the respect-
  >> content function as a full replacement for M-RET, without the need to
  >> always switch back and force between the two commands.
  >>
  >> Any thought about this?
  >
  > My position is that I want both features, and I have two key bindings,
  > so it's a perfect match.
  >
  > The way I work is that I use C-RET for creating headings, and M-RET for
  > creating plain lists.  I never use M-RET for creating headings because I
  > don't like how it creates the heading above the body of the current
  > item.
  >
  > I could set org-insert-heading-respect-content to t, but it makes more
  > sense in my head that M-RET is for plain lists, and C-RET is for
  > headings.
  >
  > Before my patch, C-RET and M-RET only differed in where the heading was
  > created (before or after the body).  But the original behavior of
  > OrgMode was that M-RET in a plain list created a new plain list item,
  > while C-RET in a plain list would create a new heading.
  >
  > However, this could all be chalked up to me being lazy.  I could just as
  > easily do this in a plain list instead: RET C-RET.  Well, except that
  > with my patch, C-RET will create a new heading, even if point is in a
  > drawer or something like a clock line.  In that case I could do C-u
  > C-RET.
  >
  > I just like the path of least resistance for creating new headings,
  > C-RET.  If this isn't good for OrgMode in general, I can easily bind C-j
  > to do what I want as well.

I liked Peter's description, tried his patch and find C-Ret and M-Ret
behaviour better now.  Earlier C-Ret and M-Ret had same effects (in my
setup) but makes better sense (to me) after the patch.  Just a humble
opinion.

-- 
Manish

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-18 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-18  0:10 [PATCH] Fix Subtle Heading Creation Bugs Peter Jones
2008-10-18  6:01 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-18 15:24   ` Peter Jones
2008-10-18 17:59     ` Manish [this message]
2008-10-22  6:02 ` [PATCH] " Carsten Dominik
2008-10-23  0:30   ` Peter Jones
2008-10-23  5:07     ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7cdbe30810181059n5b5251eaw31f91f8444b5119a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mailtomanish.sharma@gmail.com \
    --cc=dominik@science.uva.nl \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).