From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manish Subject: Re: How to produce an agenda that filters on both todo keyword and tag? Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:07:23 +0530 Message-ID: References: <9E067A1AECCB154485D4CF7E4BEF4D8E08ECF970@post07.corp.seic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLtW4-0003Fj-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:37:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLtW2-0003Dj-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:37:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42189 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLtW1-0003DZ-W6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:37:26 -0400 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.189]:28170) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLtW2-0003EX-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:37:26 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so1200931tia.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:37:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Parker, Matthew" On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: [snip] > 3. And given the fact that > C-c a t gives list of all TODO, WAITING, and DONEs > C-c a T & "WAITING" gives list of just WAITING items > C-c a m & "work" gives list of all headings tagged w/ "work", TODO or > otherwise > > The "Tags view" is really called the tags view for historical reasons. It > is really for > matching tags, properties, and TODO entries alike. Should we rename it? > The match view? The query view? Proposals? Match view sounds good to me. -- Manish