From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Re: A nice feature to suggest
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:09:42 +0100
Message-ID: <d95b12669a35e9ef17af33c3b5b88b4f@science.uva.nl>
References: <m2wt2qodwa.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
	<f03093631d932b16a018854bdb627908@science.uva.nl>
	<m2lkj5vv38.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HItI4-0006Vv-HU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:09:48 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HItI2-0006U4-Ir
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:09:47 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HItI2-0006U1-8n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:09:46 -0500
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HItI1-0001rD-SQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:09:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m2lkj5vv38.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Feb 11, 2007, at 11:37, Leo wrote:

> On 2007-02-11, Carsten Dominik said:
>
>> Why don't you "misuse" the ARCHIVE tag for this?  You could change
>> the name of the tag to LOCK or something?  Or maybe we could have a
>> list of tags that causes this behavior.
>
> For example, if I set "#+ARCHIVE: ::* Archived Tasks" and ARCHIVE tag
> "* Archived Tasks", then future archiving (org-archive-subtree) will
> create another "* Archived Tasks". Is this intended?

I have fixed this bug for 4.66.  Is there then still need for an 
additional way to lock entries from unfolding?

- Carsten


>
>> Hmmm, I guess you still want these to contribute to sparse trees and
>> the agenda.... ?
>>
>> - Carsten
>> On Feb 10, 2007, at 5:05, Leo wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Carsten,
>>>
>>> In org, if a subtree has a ARCHIVE tag, it will stay collapsed in
>>> visibility cycling. I found this functionality useful in two cases:
>>>
>>>   - When archive location is in the same file as .org file
>>>   - A tree with REPEATing items.
>>>
>>> Thus, I suggest if a heading of a subtree starts with '+', it will
>>> behave similar to a ARCHIVE tag during visibility cycling. For
>>> example, "** +Arhived Tasks...".
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -- 
>>> Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 
>>> 9283AA3F)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>>>
>>>
>
> -- 
> Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>

--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477