So these are things that I have discovered so far:

    Property Drawer:
       - Element in https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-element-api.html#orgf47acc7
         It also states that it has :properties field which is simply not there in the code
         https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L1514
         My assumption in is that Property Drawer contains Node Properties directly, as children, instead of :properties filed

       - Greater Element in https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Property_Drawers
       - Greater Element in source code https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L233

    
     Node Property:
       - Element in https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Node_Properties
       - Missing from https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-element-api.htm
       - Greater Element in source code https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L226

     Line Break:
       - Object in https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html#Line_Breaks
       - Element in https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-element-api.htm
       - Object in source code https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L239

Secondly, function that collects affiliated keywords (org-element--collect-affiliated-keywords)

https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L3988

does not take  granularity  (https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L4076)  as argument

and parse objects any way:

https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L4029

https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/src/master/lisp/org-element.el#L4036

Is there a reason behind this or is this a bug?

Ngor <ngortheone@gmail.com> writes:

Hi Org community.

I am re-posting my questions here according to Nicolas' recommendation.

I am working on a standalone parser implementation for Org which is basically a translation of elisp program to Rust
https://github.com/org-rs/org-rs

There are couple of things I wanted to ask about:

1) I have discovered several inconsistencies and errors in the Syntax/API documentation
https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-element-api.html vs https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-syntax.html vs elisp source
And I don't know the right way to report them.

2) I think I have found a bug in the algorithm (org-element-collect affiliated keywords does not take granularity into accound and seems to be always parsing objects in Caption
keyword)

3) I have a question regarding the elisp source source (specifically about the :parent of the parsed objects of the keyword)

I can elaborate on each point but I don't want to overwhelm everybody with details right from the start. I guess the meta-question is where and how
should I discuss these points? - I never used mailing lists before (If I did something incorrectly or do not follow the established rituals/traditions please do not judge me harshly.
)

No need for metaquestions: ask away.

You might want to report related problems together, but if the
connection is tenuous or non-existent, then separate posts to the
mailing list will probably work better. Asking your question in a
separate post is probably best, so it doesn't get lost in the forest
of detail when reporting problems.

If you suspect a bug, then use 'M-x org-submit-bug-report`: the bug
report will end up here and will contain a lot of information about
your set-up which might be helpful.

Finally, be patient: do not expect answers (particularly when the
questions are complicated, as it seems yours will be). It takes
a while for people to get around to even reading the posts, let
alone coming up with answers (or, as is likely, more quesions for
you).

And welcome to mailing lists in general and this mailing list in
particular!