From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baoqiu Cui Subject: Re: DocBook exporter for Org-mode Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:06:34 -0800 Message-ID: References: <18860.14549.718412.149720@muchbodyking-lm.gateway.2wire.net> <878wnmy3g8.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <87wsb6wmz9.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Leat7-0008SE-14 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:06:49 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Leat4-0008S1-Ng for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:06:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34710 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Leat4-0008Ry-HQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:43357 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Leat3-00075d-TK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Leat2-0002qs-ET for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:06:44 +0000 Received: from nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:06:44 +0000 Received: from cbaoqiu by nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:06:44 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Rose writes: > > I think we would find hundreds of xslt stylesheets on the web to > transform Docbook to virtually any format. Yes, this is the power and beauty of DocBook. > Will we loose the features of htmlize.el? > I'm not familiar with the Docbook DTD - I know it includes lots of > elements. How about time/date types, Programming types (string, > variable, class, function....)? I have not tried it, but it seems that syntax highlighting of source code listing can be done. See this page: http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SyntaxHighlighting.html > Wouldn't it be easier to transform the XHTML to docbook through xslt? > The types are not lost, since all types that emacs is aware of, are > exported as .... It should be DocBook -> XHTML if we are talking about general publishing. DocBook has enough features, tags, and more importantly, much more available tools. Baoqiu