From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baoqiu Cui Subject: Re: DocBook exporter for Org-mode Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:07:13 -0800 Message-ID: References: <18860.14549.718412.149720@muchbodyking-lm.gateway.2wire.net> <878wnmy3g8.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <87hc2awe3p.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ledhz-0003hg-Ql for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:07:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ledhu-0003dC-IF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:07:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39866 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ledhu-0003d4-B9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:07:26 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38220 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ledht-0006wS-Tq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:07:26 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ledhs-0001kE-GH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:07:24 +0000 Received: from nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com ([209.131.62.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:07:24 +0000 Received: from cbaoqiu by nat-dip4.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:07:24 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dale Smith writes: > Sebastian Rose writes: > >> The LaTeX and XHTML export (which, by the >> way, could be transformed just as good as docbook) work and are widely >> used. > > I'm not sure sure. I think docbook is much more content oriented than > LaTeX and xhtml, which seem to be more presentation oriented. To > me anyway. Yes... Once we export the content from Org files into feature-rich DocBook XML format, people can do all kinds of things on the final presentations. Baoqiu