From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Tobin Subject: Re: org-mobile-push and agenda IDs Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:19:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: <823188581001151012rd8288a5jc0e0f45480ef4498@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVqlq-0002qp-Nf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:19:42 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVqlm-0002oV-Ji for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:19:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49118 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVqlm-0002oM-A8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:19:38 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]:57775) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVqll-0007Cb-Nl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:19:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ew0-f209.google.com with SMTP id 1so12404ewy.8 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <823188581001151012rd8288a5jc0e0f45480ef4498@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Richard Moreland wrote: > Hi Tom, > > They are not required, but they eliminate potential problems that may > be encountered with the simple path-based node identification scheme. > The risk level is fairly low, and you should be fine with the force > option disabled. > > The path-based id scheme fails if you have this: > > * Parent > ** A name > *** A node you didn't edit > ** A name > *** A node you edited > > The path to the node you edited is ambiguous and will cause a sync > conflict. =C2=A0As long as you keep this in mind, you should be fine. So as long as I don't duplicate names in the same level, I should be okay? I don't see myself ever doing that anyway, so that seems harmless enough. Aside =E2=80=94 there's no way to cycle the visibility of drawers to *completely* hidden, is there? I wouldn't mind the property drawers as much if I could completely ignore their existence during routine org-mode editing. :-)