From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org-mode + xemacs + patch Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:01:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7uejz3tgzd.fsf@horizonsemi.com> <3e5c1fd8f70c4ab0a1c887201cd1666f@science.uva.nl> <7upsilvusi.fsf@horizonsemi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe72s-0007As-QS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:01:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe72q-00077g-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:01:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe72q-00077O-0G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:01:16 -0400 Received: from [194.134.35.149] (helo=smtp08.wanadoo.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fe74J-0007m1-9G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 05:02:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7upsilvusi.fsf@horizonsemi.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: chgreg692000@yahoo.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On May 11, 2006, at 10:18, chgreg692000@yahoo.com wrote: >>> (get-char-property (1- (point)) 'invisible)) >>> (beginning-of-line 2)) (setq eol (point))) >>> (outline-end-of-heading) (setq eoh (point)) >>> - (org-end-of-subtree t) (setq eos (point)) >>> + ;;(org-end-of-subtree t) (setq eos (point)) >>> + (outline-end-of-subtree) (setq eos (point)) >>> (outline-next-heading)) >> >> Why is the above change necessary? > > Without this change 'org-cycle' gives error when > 'org-cycle-include-plain-lists' is t. This is in the not noutline section of the code, so I guess you fixed this before using your new noutline? Anyway, yes, a bug, I fixed it (in a different way). Thanks. I really appreciate that you went through the trouble of actually providing a patch. - Carsten