From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Set priority by S-<up> or S-<down> does not seem to work in an
 indirect buffer in the first todo headline
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:34:23 +0200
Message-ID: <bb9d0f05f66d973f3fb260cfb373b848@science.uva.nl>
References: <fdoor6$qv$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IcRuO-0002dQ-OG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:30:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IcRuN-0002cs-47
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:30:28 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcRuM-0002cm-SM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:30:26 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1IcRuM-0001d6-HL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:30:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <fdoor6$qv$1@sea.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Sep 30, 2007, at 20:10, Rainer Stengele wrote:

> as the subjct already says ... S-up does not do in the indirect buffer 
> what it does in the "direct" buffer.
>
> Instead of a priority I get "Beginning of buffer".
> Is this a bug?

It sure is.  Fixed for next version, thanks.

- Carsten