From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [BUG?] Diary entries do not appear in timeline Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:19:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200709160100.l8G10C4w005828@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXBZF-0005m4-Qg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:02:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXBZD-0005jb-No for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:02:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXBZC-0005jG-R0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:02:50 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IXBZB-0007wk-Qp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:02:49 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IXAqp-0008Fg-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:16:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200709160100.l8G10C4w005828@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Xavier Maillard Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 16, 2007, at 3:00, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Hi, > > With org-mode 5.08, pressing C-a L does not show my diary > entries. > > My org mode file contains entries like that: > > %%(diary-anniversary 09 6 2007) Lubin %d ans > ... > > I only see my meeting entries (but there are not diary entries > just standard item timestamped). > > Is that a bug ? Hmmmm, including the diary entries would make this operation very expensive, because every day would have to be checked, starting from an unknown starting date in the past to an unknown ending date in the future. The timeline display is fast because if first makes a list of dates in the buffer and then gets full displays only for these. This means that dates with repeaters and diary stuff will not work, unless by chance - i.e. if the day is being listed anyway because some other simple timestamp pointed to it. It may be better to use restricted call to the daily/weekly agenda for this, but force a starting date and a number of days to check. - Carsten