From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eddward DeVilla Subject: Re: Checkboxes and intermediate state Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:12 -0600 Message-ID: References: <6E2ACEFCD9804F60A9411D1965D22893@CUBE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZGVK-0002dw-A1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:20:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZGVJ-0002dX-R6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:20:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39958 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZGVJ-0002dH-LS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:20:13 -0500 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.155]:52160) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZGVJ-0007CT-Es for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:20:13 -0500 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so1183082yxf.66 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:20:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > The reason for this assumption is that as of now, you are the only > person *I know* who uses this have-ready state of checkboxes. > Given the fact that I every now and then do need to remove > a checkbox, this seemed the logical choice to me. > > But I am glad you bring it up, it is perfectly possible that > I see it wrong and that it would be better to reverse the > action of single and double prefix argument. Thanks to this thread, I'm now aware of these commands and will make good use of both. Thanks! Edd