On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Lundin wrote: > "news.gmane.org" writes: > > > Sebastian Rose schrieb: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> > >> "Eric Schulte" writes: > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> Is there any Reason why you don't just make the dividers the first > level > >>> of headlines? -- Eric > >> > [snip] > >> > >>> "David A. Gershman" writes: > >>> > >>>> In my org file, I have different sections setup. I'd like to separate > >>>> the sections with comment dividers. For example, I'd like to have: > >>>> > >>>> ##################### > >>>> # Section 1 > >>>> > >>>> * Heading 1 > >>>> * Heading 2 > >>>> * Heading 3 > >>>> > >>>> # End Section 1 > >>>> ##################### > >>>> > >>>> ##################### > >>>> # Section 2 > >>>> > >>>> * Heading 1 > >>>> * Heading 2 > >>>> * Heading 3 > >>>> > >>>> # End Section 2 > >>>> ##################### > >>>> > >>>> But when I fold stuff, I get: > >>>> > >>>> * Heading 1... > >>>> * Heading 3... > >>>> * Heading 1... > >>>> * Heading 3... > >>>> > >>>> Notice the dividers got folded into the trees. Any way to prevent > this? > > When I need quick dividers for better visibility, I adopt the approach > Eric mentions above. E.g., > > * ----section one------ > * Heading one > * Heading two > * ----section two------ > * Heading one > * Heading two > I've considered that myself, but I just don't like the look of it. More than once I've wished I could use something like the hline markup and get a horizontal line that was scoped with the reset of the outline in the org-buffer and on export. So something like the following ################# * foo 1 * foo 2 ----- * bar 1 *** bar 1.1 ----- * bar 2 ----- * Baz! ################ would display as ################ * foo 1 * foo2 ------------------ <= buffer or wrap wide, doesn't fold into foo2 * bar 1 *** bar 1.1 -------------- <= buffer or wrap wide, doesn't fold into Bar 1.1 but does fold into Bar 1 * bar 2 ------------------ <= buffer or wrap wide, doesn't fold into foo2 * Baz! ################ I'd guess it might not be too hard with the right but I haven't been annoyed enough to look into it. Edd