From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eddward DeVilla" Subject: Re: relative scheduling Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:56:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3jve9n6oxf.fsf@home.net> <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfN3k-0007WS-N4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:56:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfN3j-0007Ux-Qu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:56:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfN3j-0007UZ-Ih for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:56:11 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.191]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfN3j-0008HO-3L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:56:11 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so7773muf for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:56:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29178d4ffee1d1d7a249c67ca0592b65@science.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode , Richard G Riley On 10/9/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > However, a different question pops up here. When rescheduling, > should the +Nd be relative to today, or relative to > the currently scheduled date? I don't have a preference. Would it be reasonable to have both? +2d & now+2d +=2 & +2? Just a thought. Edd