From: "Eddward DeVilla" <eddward@gmail.com>
To: Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: definition lists in org-mode
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:52:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b71b18520707060852h2678b108vba74485776fb1a5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <468E1D59.6030006@calicojack.co.uk>
On 7/6/07, Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk> wrote:
> After thinking about it; I have on occasion wanted to schedule a
> checkboxed item into the agenda. This said I'm not convinced supporting
> this is a good idea. Does anyone else have any views?
I'm usually for collapsing similar things in to one more flexible
thing, but there is a lot of meaning attached to something being a
todo entry in the outline as opposed to being a mere checkbox in a
list. Some times it would be nice to steal a feature of one and use
it on the other, but the implicit difference is too useful I think to
collapse them.
I remember Carsten musing about this in the past and it sounds like
there were some implementation issues that made it unreasonable. It
it were reasonable to implement and if it was just as easy to get the
current differences between todo entries and checkbox lists then I
guess I wouldn't be against it. If everything became an outline entry
I would definitely need the '*' hiding though. :-)
Edd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-05 22:01 definition lists in org-mode Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-06 9:56 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-07-06 10:34 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-06 10:45 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-07-06 12:43 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-06 15:52 ` Eddward DeVilla [this message]
2007-07-06 16:28 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-07-06 17:22 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-11 11:52 ` Suggestion: Jump points Rick Moynihan
2007-07-11 14:51 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-11 15:20 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-07-11 15:45 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-12 12:24 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-11 15:28 ` Scott Jaderholm
2007-07-11 16:29 ` Rick Moynihan
2007-07-11 18:23 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-09-03 16:21 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-06 15:33 ` definition lists in org-mode Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-06 15:25 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-06 10:44 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-07-06 15:43 ` Eddward DeVilla
2007-07-06 17:25 ` Carsten Dominik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b71b18520707060852h2678b108vba74485776fb1a5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eddward@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rick@calicojack.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).