From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dmitri Minaev" Subject: Re: org priority cycling - removing priorities Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:08:05 +0500 Message-ID: References: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZp0-00049Z-LD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:08:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZox-00046P-Kz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:08:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITZox-00046G-Ez for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:08:11 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITZow-0007mr-Hg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:08:10 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e27so397672nfd for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:08:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rick Moynihan Cc: emacs-orgmode On 9/6/07, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Every now and then I find myself mispressing SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down on an > outline and assigning a priority to it. This then often leads me to > navigating the point to the priority to delete it manually. > > This way I could easily undo the operation with the same keys. Is there > any good reason not to have this behaviour? C-c , seems comfortable enough to suffice... -- With best regards, Dmitri Minaev Russian history blog: http://minaev.blogspot.com